<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Facts &#187; footprint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climatefacts.net/topics/footprint/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climatefacts.net</link>
	<description>For people who wants the truth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:41:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Copenhagens carbon footprint</title>
		<link>http://climatefacts.net/article-79-2009-copenhagens-carbon-footprint</link>
		<comments>http://climatefacts.net/article-79-2009-copenhagens-carbon-footprint#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sprucefield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COP15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jpmorgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatefacts.net/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, we have already discussed the effect of CO2, so based on this, it doesn&#8217;t really have any real impact, but let us just have a look at things, AS IF it were to have an impact as claimed by the climate scientists. The U.N. estimates the 12-day conference will create 40,584 tons of carbon [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, we have already discussed the effect of CO2, so based on this, it doesn&#8217;t really have any real impact, but let us just have a look at things, AS IF it were to have an impact as claimed by the climate scientists.</p>
<p>The U.N. estimates the 12-day conference will create 40,584 tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, roughly as it has been claimed, to be the same amount as the carbon emissions of Morocco in 2006.</p>
<p>There you have it &#8211; the same emissions as a small nation in Western Sahara with some 33 million in population, to accommodate 16.500 delegates, journalists and activists during the 12 day event.</p>
<p>Perhaps, the delegates with their 2.5t individual footprint during the 12 days could learn something from the average moroccan with their average footprint of a mere 1.2Kg per year.</p>
<p>To offset these 40,600 tonnes of carbon with carbon credits, the price would be about €390,000 according to [<a href="http://www.jpmorganclimatecare.com/" target="_blank">jpmorgan climatecare</a>].</p>
<p>This would according to other estimates be equivalent of planting 243,000 trees, to offset the Copenhagen event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climatefacts.net/article-79-2009-copenhagens-carbon-footprint/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

